« Judge hearing park sale request raises questions of jurisdiction, related lawsuit & dismissal of earlier app | Main | Dump unlimited house items on Spring Clean Up Day »

March 26, 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834519d4869e201156e66889b970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Possible ruling in Coryell lawsuit at April 6 hearing:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Concerned La Grange Resident

Orlando, what's your problem?!!!! The people of La Grange voted YES to the sale of the park district land!!!!!!!!!!!!!! What are you trying to prove Orlando???????? Get a life and stop trying to get in the way of progress!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevin Shields

Selling open space is not progress!!!!!!!!

James H. Workman

Sale of the land is most definitely progress. Transfer of the small parcel of park land behind the old rich port YMCA will allow that building, which has turned in to a decrepit and dangerous eyesore attractive only to vandals and vagrants, to be demolished and replaced with a new and aesthetically pleasing development that our town needs. More affordable housing, resulting in an increased tax base for our schools, as well as a fantastically improved Gordon Park, and a re-worked and improved intersection at Ogden and LaGrange roads are also part of the plan. How can this not be progress?

WilliamDobias

James -
Sorry, the logic in your comment does not track with the facts. Transfer of the small parcel of land immediately behind the abandoned YMCA building will allow ARP to build the large apartment and condo building in the La Grange Place PUD. Neither Orlando Coryell nor any of the rest of us oppose this sale. But, the Village of La Grange should have demanded a plan from the downtown YMCA board as to their intentions for demolition instead of allowing the building to sit for two years. Countryside and Brookfield have shown the way for this - making property owners demolish structures before the property in question is sold.

The northern portion of Gordon Park is unnecessary for this development - only for 26 townhouses. This is the sale that we all oppose. An improved Gordon Park could easily result from the almost $3 million the park board will receive for the small parcel behind the YMCA building - if they weren't, as they admitted at last Monday's meeting, facing a budget crisis with a recreation building that is barely making expenses (their comment) and that is saddled with a near $3 million revenue bond with debt service of almost $300,00 per year.

The developer (ARP) is only going to improve the northeast corner of the Ogden and La Grange Road intersection. The $1 million that the village set aside to improve the rest of the intersection has now been redirected to the La Grange Theater. Sounds like we're going to have an intersection with a widened right turn lane on Ogden, an island on the northeast corner, a widened La Grange Road and little other improvement to help those of us who walk through this intersection daily to safely navigate it.

Progress? I would label it more public official ineptitude.

The comments to this entry are closed.