The Park District of La Grange at its regular monthly meeting Thursday night made public its response to a proposal issued last week by La Grange Friends of the Park in an effort to end two years of litigation over the park district's efforts to sell 2.82 acres of Gordon Park to developer Atlantic Realty Partners for inclusion in its redevelopment of the former Rich Port YMCA property.
In the video excerpts below, Mary Ellen Penicook, a park district commissioner, reads aloud the contents of the response.
PART ONE
PART TWO
Related story:
Thanks for the update. I know that transcribing is a lot of work if PDLG didn't give you a copy of their response, but I sure would have preferred reading about it than having to listen to Mary Ellen Penicook.
Posted by: WilliamDobias | November 20, 2009 at 12:15 PM
I did not specifically ask Dean, but I believe that this response would be appropriate for posting on the PDLG web site under the policy adopted (IIRC) two months ago.
Given that the response was read aloud, I'd be astounded if it were not available upon request from the PDLG (perhaps Thom has requested it already). I'd be pretty surprised if you don't see a PDF of it pretty soon.
Posted by: Chris Walsh | November 21, 2009 at 02:30 PM
Thanks Chris - I'll look forward to seeing it in either place.
Posted by: WilliamDobias | November 21, 2009 at 05:39 PM
Chris,
The park district's monthly check run of what vendors get how much money should be posted on the PDLG website. This is available in the meeting room during meetings, but labeled "do not remove from meeting room?".
It's the people's money, not the boards money. All taxpayersr have a RIGHT to see how their money is spent. My PDLG taxes are not optional.
If the PDLG is proud of all their expenditures, they need to be posted.
Most importantly, it will create competition with PDLG Vendors and expose potential corruption or conflicts of interest.
Posted by: Jim Boo | November 22, 2009 at 07:51 AM
The document is posted at
http://www.pdlg.org/documents/Commissioners%20response%20to%20the%20objectors%20demands.pdf
Posted by: Chris Walsh | December 08, 2009 at 11:26 AM